Statistics Table
				
					
					
				
				
					
						| Type | 
				
				
					
						| Filed | 
					
						| Settled | 
					
						| Dismissed by Panel | 
					
						| Decided by Full Bench
 | Unconstitutional2 | 
					
						| Nonconformity3 | 
					
					    | Conditionally Unconstitutional4
 | 
					
					    | Conditionally Constitutional5
 | 
					
					    | Constitutional | 
					
					    | Upheld6 | 
					
					    | Rejected | 
					
					    | Dismissed | 
					
					    | Other | 
					
					    | Withdrawn | 
					
					    | Pending | 
		      
		
		
	 
	
	    - This type of "Constitutionality of Statutes" case refers to the constitutionality of statutes cases brought by ordinary courts, i.e., any court other than the Constitutional Court.
- "Unconstitutional" : Used in Constitutionality of Laws cases.
- "Nonconformity" : This conclusion means the Court acknowledges a law's unconstitutionality but merely requests the National Assembly to revise it by a certain period while having the law remain effective until that time.
- "Conditionally Unconstitutional" : In cases challenging the constitutionality of a law, the Court prohibits a particular way of interpretation of a law as unconstitutional, while having other interpretations remain constitutional.
- "Conditionally Constitutional" : This means that a law is constitutional if it is interpreted according to the designated way.This is the converse of "Unconstitutional, in certain context". Both are regarded as decisions of "partially unconstitutional".
- "Upheld" : This conclusion is used when the Court accepts a Constitutional Complaint which does not include a constitutionality of law issue.